Web 2.0 - Nothing to see here... moving right along...
I, myself, have written about Web 3.0 late last year. Here's an excerpt:
Web 3.0? Are you serious? Apparently a lot of people are. More than I imagined. It seems from the search results, though, Web 3.0 is some sort of Web 2.0 - except with more of everything. More mainstream users, more revenue (or finding a way to get revenue in the first place), more programmable etc.To summarize - I thought it was a silly idea.
I was going to ignore the subject this time until I read a post by Peter Rip. I love this quote:
"VCs have always made money at finding the ideal point of friction between the Present and the Future. Profits accumulate in the gap between What Is and What Is Possible. Web 2.0 is now firmly in the category of What Is."
The quote caught my eye because one or two VCs I have spoken to (and an awful lot of investor types are always fishing around) make the statement "oh it's too early for this kind of thing" (this kind of thing being a focus on Attention as a consumer tool). It always makes me laugh.
I think Peter is spot on. I too am tired of all the 'me too' services out there. They are so unoriginal. In many cases the winners have been decided.
I do have a problem, however, with claiming that Web 3.0 is all about web services. Web services are an old idea and APIs are already part of the Web 2.0 evolution. So to claim that they are part of Web 3.0 is a bit like saying 'HTML is part of Web 2.0'.
APIs are here to stay. Screen scraping will reduce over time as apps either play nice or die. But I don't think that broader adoption of APIs is a sufficient paradigm change (at least on its own) to justify a new version number.
So to summarize:
- Web 0.5 was about communication - Chat/Email.
- Web 1.0 was about one way publishing - CMS/Portals - Corporates came first and they declared their message to us poor users. Community was relegated to a second class citizen on forums (if at all)
- Web 2.0 was about two way publishing - Blogs/YouTube/Digg - The community (specifically the individual acting as part of a community) become a first class citizen. The web became personal.
I am not sure Web 3.0 is coming. At least not any time soon. Instead I think the next big opportunity is Media 2.0.
I think that Web 2.0 was merely an overdue adjustment in our thinking. It was a realization that the web is not just another broadcast medium. That broadcasting radio/TV/print over TCP/IP was not the point or the promise of this new platform. It was a realization that interaction models that empowered the audience to become the most important part of the ecosystem was the actual point of the medium.
It's like when TV grew up and stopped doing radio plays and started doing lifelike drama.
I think the next revolution is the web transforming other forms of media. That is, creating interaction models that go beyond the web (or extend the web into more places and form factors). It's about the web transforming traditional TV, Radio and Print to become more interactive. It's about democratizing the mainstream - not just on the web - but everywhere.
Labels: broadcasting, Media 2.0, print, radio, ReadWriteWeb, TV, web 2.0, web 3.0
3 Comments:
Okay, I'll bite (even though I already wrote about it today as well.) Alex's post was too much for me to digest - the sheer length of his writing these days scares me.
Web 3.0 isn't coming. Just looking at everyone's definitions makes it look like it's forking - we're going to have to layer in a versioning system just to keep track. Is it the Semantic Web? Is it the OEM Web? Does it matter? Maybe it's just the Web again.
I think the new push -- and not just one that will have a version label -- will be in making content portable. Not in a gigaom kind of way, but in a "I wrote it and I'm taking it with me" kind of way.
Like I wrote at least once today, Web 2.0 has melted. It's now just the Web again (with better plug-ins.)
So we make all this content, build the web into a distribution mechanism, put it out there so others can see it...now what?
The "now what" seems to me to be the frontier that new Web development is seeking to explore, and build out. Your comment about the maturing of TV as a vehicle in the mass medium was spot on, Chris. And what is happening right now with regard to web content is a growing realization that much of what we call "Social Media" is nothing but a Mass Media distribution paradigm in a new online suit. For instance, podcasting and online video. Either of these content forms can be consumed passively, just as television, radio and print can be. What makes them laden with the promise of Social Media is what can be done with them. Seeking to answer the "how to make online content inherently social" question is what makes me so excited to be a part of web development right now.
Web 2.0 is just a name for a paradigm. When enough anomalies appear in any paradigm, it falls apart. The Web 2.0 paradigm was all about opening everything up. Okay, it's opened up. Now we're all drowning in content. End of paradigm. The Web 3.0 paradigm will be about filtering and making things personal. We're trying a bit of that at www.crowdrules.com
Post a Comment
<< Home